<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tooling on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/tooling/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Tooling on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:10:19 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/tooling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Do Not Guess: The Sentence That Cut Invented Fields by Two Thirds</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/do-not-guess-the-sentence-that-cut-invented-fields-by-two-thirds/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:10:19 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/do-not-guess-the-sentence-that-cut-invented-fields-by-two-thirds/</guid>
      <description>A third-party benchmark finds one prompt sentence cuts invented fields from 70.7% to 20.2% across 16 models, and that a paid API on a free tier fabricated more than 13 of them.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When AI Coding Made CI the New Bottleneck</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/when-ai-coding-made-ci-the-new-bottleneck/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:57:03 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/when-ai-coding-made-ci-the-new-bottleneck/</guid>
      <description>Linear&amp;rsquo;s engineers found that faster code generation just moved the wait. An account of what happened when the bottleneck shifted downstream.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
