<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Software Security on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/software-security/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Software Security on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:12:53 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/software-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CheckerBench: 78% Compiled, 32% Were Accepted</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/checkerbench-78-compiled-32-were-accepted/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:12:53 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/checkerbench-78-compiled-32-were-accepted/</guid>
      <description>A new benchmark had AI agents write reusable static-analysis checkers. 78.25% compiled, 73.65% told the broken revision from the fixed one, 32.30% were accepted. The loss is almost entirely after detection, and the two obvious explanations both test small.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
