<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>OpenAI on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/openai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in OpenAI on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:15:42 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/openai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Published 722 Proofs Against a Five-Point Checklist</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/openai-published-722-proofs-against-a-five-point-checklist/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:15:42 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/openai-published-722-proofs-against-a-five-point-checklist/</guid>
      <description>An independent advisory group published five conditions for releasing AI-generated mathematics. A week later OpenAI released 722 manuscripts and cited them. Graded clause by clause: four gaps OpenAI names itself, one it does not.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rogue Agent Argument, Checked Against the Reports</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/the-rogue-agent-argument-checked-against-the-reports/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:19:40 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/the-rogue-agent-argument-checked-against-the-reports/</guid>
      <description>A published critique argues that calling OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s agents rogue lets the company off the hook. Checked against the two primary incident reports, its language claim holds and its central factual claim does not.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GPT-6 Sol and Luna: Reading the Benchmark Footnotes</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:21:29 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</guid>
      <description>OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s GPT-6 Sol and Luna announcement is a cost-efficiency pitch. Its own footnotes concede that the closest competitor&amp;rsquo;s cost is the one figure not reported.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
