<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Model Security on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/model-security/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Model Security on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:08:39 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/model-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Four Elicitation Methods Failed, the Fifth Guessed All 256 Triggers</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/four-elicitation-methods-failed-the-fifth-guessed-all-256-triggers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:08:39 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/four-elicitation-methods-failed-the-fifth-guessed-all-256-triggers/</guid>
      <description>Five elicitation methods were run against a model with a chemistry classifier encrypted into its weights. Four returned chance accuracy. The fifth recovered it by enumerating all 256 possible triggers, which the authors say themselves.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
