<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Benchmarks on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/benchmarks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Benchmarks on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:15:52 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/benchmarks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Apple&#39;s Best MLX Number Lives in a Tab a Fetcher Never Gets</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/apples-best-mlx-number-lives-in-a-tab-a-fetcher-never-gets/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:15:52 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/apples-best-mlx-number-lives-in-a-tab-a-fetcher-never-gets/</guid>
      <description>Apple&amp;rsquo;s MLX post verifies on every load-bearing figure. Its best number sits in a table tab that is not server-rendered, so a fetcher-based reader never sees it. A full recount of all 32 parallelism cells.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three Fixes Work, Two Do Not, and SSRF Stays at 2.4%</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/three-fixes-work-two-do-not-and-ssrf-stays-at-24/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:13:41 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/three-fixes-work-two-do-not-and-ssrf-stays-at-24/</guid>
      <description>An agent benchmark where the top performer on functional tests wrote the least secure code. Three interventions measurably help, two do not, and two weakness families stay near zero throughout.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CheckerBench: 78% Compiled, 32% Were Accepted</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/checkerbench-78-compiled-32-were-accepted/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:12:53 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/checkerbench-78-compiled-32-were-accepted/</guid>
      <description>A new benchmark had AI agents write reusable static-analysis checkers. 78.25% compiled, 73.65% told the broken revision from the fixed one, 32.30% were accepted. The loss is almost entirely after detection, and the two obvious explanations both test small.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Laya vs Jev: A Challenger With Its Own Scorecard</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/laya-vs-jev-a-challenger-with-its-own-scorecard/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:17:11 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/laya-vs-jev-a-challenger-with-its-own-scorecard/</guid>
      <description>An open-source challenger to Jev ships with a comparison table. The accuracy claim does not survive reading the rest of the page, but the structural argument does.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GPT-6 Sol and Luna: Reading the Benchmark Footnotes</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:21:29 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</guid>
      <description>OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s GPT-6 Sol and Luna announcement is a cost-efficiency pitch. Its own footnotes concede that the closest competitor&amp;rsquo;s cost is the one figure not reported.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
