<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>AI Models on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/ai-models/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI Models on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:17:11 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/ai-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Laya vs Jev: A Challenger With Its Own Scorecard</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/laya-vs-jev-a-challenger-with-its-own-scorecard/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:17:11 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/laya-vs-jev-a-challenger-with-its-own-scorecard/</guid>
      <description>An open-source challenger to Jev ships with a comparison table. The accuracy claim does not survive reading the rest of the page, but the structural argument does.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GPT-6 Sol and Luna: Reading the Benchmark Footnotes</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:21:29 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/gpt-6-sol-and-luna-reading-the-benchmark-footnotes/</guid>
      <description>OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s GPT-6 Sol and Luna announcement is a cost-efficiency pitch. Its own footnotes concede that the closest competitor&amp;rsquo;s cost is the one figure not reported.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What People Are Actually Building on Jev</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/what-people-are-actually-building-on-jev/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:35:59 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/what-people-are-actually-building-on-jev/</guid>
      <description>A week after launch is when the real question gets answered: does anyone build on it. For Jev the early answer is code review, model routing and linting - places where which one matters more than write me something.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jev and TypeSafe AI&#39;s System One Models</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/jev-and-typesafe-ais-system-one-models/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:35:47 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/jev-and-typesafe-ais-system-one-models/</guid>
      <description>Every model you have used generates text one token at a time, even when all you needed was yes or no. TypeSafe AI built one that returns typed values instead.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B: A 27B Model in 6GB</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/ternary-bonsai-2-27b-a-27b-model-in-6gb/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:35:36 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/ternary-bonsai-2-27b-a-27b-model-in-6gb/</guid>
      <description>A 27B model squeezed into 5.95GB at 1.72 bits per weight, claiming 98.2% of full-precision performance on its own benchmark suite - and what that compression actually costs.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qwen-Image-2.1: Native Transparency and a License Catch</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/qwen-image-21-native-transparency-and-a-license-catch/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:27:26 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/qwen-image-21-native-transparency-and-a-license-catch/</guid>
      <description>Alibaba built transparency into the image format itself rather than removing backgrounds afterwards - then shipped it under a research licence instead of the Apache 2.0 its predecessors used.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and the KV Cache Problem</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/deepseek-v41-flash-and-the-kv-cache-problem/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:27:17 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/deepseek-v41-flash-and-the-kv-cache-problem/</guid>
      <description>DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is bigger than its predecessor and cheaper to run. The savings come from cutting KV cache to 890 bytes per token - about a quarter of the previous model.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
