<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>AI Governance on AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/ai-governance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI Governance on AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:19:40 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.ngchi.online/tags/ai-governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Rogue Agent Argument, Checked Against the Reports</title>
      <link>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/the-rogue-agent-argument-checked-against-the-reports/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:19:40 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.ngchi.online/posts/the-rogue-agent-argument-checked-against-the-reports/</guid>
      <description>A published critique argues that calling OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s agents rogue lets the company off the hook. Checked against the two primary incident reports, its language claim holds and its central factual claim does not.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
